Asana and Jira are two well-liked undertaking administration instruments that assist agile administration.
Though each instruments show to be fairly complete, Asana is a versatile and user-friendly software that appeals to a greater diversity of groups, from advertising to gross sales, design and extra. It presents a easy, visible option to manage work, with options like job lists, kanban boards, calendars and extra.
Alternatively, Jira, developed by Atlassian, is a undertaking administration software designed particularly for software program improvement groups. It presents a strong function set that helps agile methodologies, together with scrum and kanban boards, backlogs, dash planning instruments and extra.
Asana vs. Jira: Comparability desk
Options | ||
---|---|---|
Our score | ||
Beginning value (billed month-to-month) | ||
Ease of use | ||
Agile assist | ||
Native time monitoring | ||
Gantt charts | ||
|
|
Asana vs. Jira: Pricing
Asana’s pricing construction is easy, with three tiers for people and companies, together with a free tier providing primary performance with assist for as much as 10 customers. However you’ll need to pay for options like Gantt and Timeline views. The remaining two tiers are reserved for enterprises for which you’ll obtain pricing upon request.
As for Jira, we’ve 4 tiers, with a free tier that accommodates as much as 10 customers. The 2 premium tiers after the free tier value a lot lower than comparable tiers in Asana. Nonetheless, when Jira is billed yearly, it does away with per-user prices with tiers that accommodate greater than 200 customers. This gives the look that, whereas Jira is accessible to smaller groups, its pricing is way more appropriate for bigger and scaling groups.
Asana pricing
- Private: Free eternally.
- Starter: $10.99 per person per thirty days, billed yearly, or $13.49 per person per thirty days, billed month-to-month.
- Superior: $24.99 per person per thirty days, billed yearly, or $30.49 per person per thirty days, billed month-to-month.
- Enterprise: Customized pricing.
- Enterprise+: Customized pricing.
For extra data on Asana, learn our full Asana overview or try our Asana options.
Jira pricing
- Free: Accessible for as much as 10 customers.
- Normal: $8.15 per person per thirty days.
- Premium: $16 per person per thirty days.
- Enterprise: Customized pricing, solely billed yearly.
For extra particulars, try our full Jira Software program overview, or for different concepts, overview our Jira options.
Asana vs. Jira: Function comparability
Agile assist
Winner: Jira
Asana helps agile undertaking administration with its kanban-style boards. They’re a visible option to handle workflows, permitting groups to trace progress with ease and prioritize duties successfully. Though Asana’s boards are user-friendly and versatile — coupled with capabilities like customized fields and job dependencies, which can be utilized to create scrum-like workflows — it lacks a number of the superior options present in instruments particularly designed for agile improvement​ like Jira. Jira is a greater match for groups utilizing a extra versatile or hybrid strategy to agile.
Groups utilizing scrum or kanban methodologies might be proper at residence with Jira’s agile boards. The boards are extremely customizable and built-in with different Jira options, reminiscent of backlogs and dash planning instruments. Jira’s agile capabilities are extra superior than Asana’s, offering thorough performance to handle complicated initiatives and observe progress precisely​.
Native time-tracking
Winner: Tie
Asana gives a local time-tracking function for Superior, Enterprise and Enterprise+ clients, permitting customers to maintain observe of time spent on duties instantly throughout the platform. Moreover, you possibly can combine it with a number of time-tracking instruments like Harvest, Everhour and Toggl to trace time spent on varied duties instantly inside Asana. These integrations come in useful for groups that need time monitoring however aren’t subscribed to the superior pricing tiers in Asana. They’ll additionally come in useful for customers who could discover extra performance in an integration in comparison with native time monitoring.
Jira additionally has a built-in time-tracking function. Customers can log work on a difficulty and observe time spent, remaining and unique estimates. The platform gives quite a few configuration choices for time monitoring and reporting, making it really feel like you might have higher flexibility and oversight of your monitoring actions. Groups utilizing scrum or kanban methodologies will worth this, as monitoring time spent on duties helps with dash planning and managing work in progress.
Gantt charts
Winner: Asana
It may be argued that Asana’s Timeline view can supply Gantt capabilities to a sure diploma. Nonetheless, Asana does have Gantt performance impartial of its Timeline view. I discovered mapping out undertaking plans visually and displaying job dependencies and timelines to be simple in Asana. These charts are simple to make use of and combine seamlessly with different undertaking views, which makes it easy to modify between completely different views on a undertaking. Nonetheless, Asana’s Gantt function isn’t obtainable for the Private plan, although the Timeline view is.
Speaking about timeline views, Jira’s Timeline view is one in every of its two native Gantt chart choices. With it you get the instruments and controls to trace complicated initiatives with a number of duties and large groups. Nonetheless, it’s finest for team-level administration. The second providing is Plans, a sophisticated planning function that visualizes work for a number of groups, initiatives and even organization-wide initiatives. It’s obtainable in Jira Premium.
Ease of use
Winner: Asana
Asana is thought for its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Its design focuses on simplicity, making it simple for brand spanking new customers to get began rapidly. In comparison with Jira, I discovered it to be simpler to select up and use. The visible structure, mixed with drag-and-drop performance, made managing duties and initiatives way more intuitive. For groups in search of a low studying curve​, Asana could be a nice match. Nonetheless, it’s value noting that it has superior options which will take a while to grasp.
Jira’s interface can really feel extra complicated attributable to its in depth function set and customization choices.
Whereas Jira does an incredible job of onboarding new customers and making the platform really feel as easy to select up as potential, Jira’s sturdy function set and extremely technical nature work in opposition to it because it nonetheless feels complicated, particularly to the non-technical person. Even so, whereas this complexity could be a problem for brand spanking new customers, Jira gives complete tutorials and documentation to assist customers navigate its options, but it surely usually requires extra time to grasp in comparison with Asana​.
Buyer assist
Winner: Jira
Asana presents varied assist choices, relying on the pricing plan. The free plan contains entry to group assist and primary Asana assist. Paid plans present extra in depth assist, with 24/7 assist obtainable solely to enterprise customers. Asana additionally presents a variety of sources reminiscent of tutorials, webinars and an in depth data base​ which can be found in most of its pricing tiers.
As for Jira, we’re taking a look at extra sturdy buyer assist throughout its pricing tiers. The free plan contains entry to the Atlassian group. The usual plan presents native enterprise hours assist, whereas the premium plan gives 24/7 assist for essential points. Enterprise customers profit from 24/7 assist for all points and the next uptime SLA.
Safety
Winner: Tie
Asana prioritizes safety with options like knowledge encryption at relaxation and in transit and options like SAML, SIEM integration, DLP and superior admin controls obtainable in its enterprise plans. The platform complies with main trade requirements, reminiscent of SOC 2 Sort II, that means that sturdy knowledge safety measures are consistently in place​.
Jira additionally has thorough safety features, notably in its premium and enterprise plans. These embody superior admin controls, SAML SSO, SCIM for person provisioning and encryption. Jira’s enterprise plan additionally gives further safety measures reminiscent of audit logs, BYOK encryption and compliance with varied trade requirements, making it appropriate for organizations with stringent safety necessities​.
Asana professionals and cons
Professionals of Asana
- Has a user-friendly interface and is extremely versatile.
- Visible strategy to undertaking administration that makes it simpler for groups to handle their work.
- Its versatility means it’s appropriate for a variety of industries and groups.
- Asana has a variety of integrations.
Cons of Asana
- Asana lacks a number of the extra superior options present in instruments like Jira.
- Its reporting options really feel restricted in comparison with Jira.
- No native time monitoring in decrease plans.
- Could have too many options for small groups to totally make the most of
Jira professionals and cons
Professionals of Jira
- Concentrate on agile methodologies makes it a robust software for software program improvement groups.
- Has superior reporting and analytics capabilities.
- Pricing adjusts primarily based on the variety of customers, making it nice for scaling groups.
- Has in depth Gantt performance.
Cons of Jira
- Extremely technical nature is a barrier to entry for non-technical customers.
- Might be overwhelming for first-time customers.
- Has a restricted collection of undertaking views.
- Collaboration instruments are restricted.
Ought to your group use Asana or Jira?
It comes right down to your wants and workflows. In case your staff values a user-friendly interface with versatile job administration, Asana is the higher selection. Alternatively, in case your staff is closely invested in agile methodologies, notably in a software program improvement context, Jira may present important benefits.
Nonetheless, nothing beats first-hand expertise, and since Asana and Jira supply free plans, we encourage you to check out every software and see which one works finest on your staff.
Select Asana if . . .
- You want a user-friendly resolution with easy agile performance.
- You want primary to intermediate undertaking administration options.
- You want an answer that’s adaptable to quite a lot of groups and industries.
- You worth collaboration and communication instruments.
- You don’t desire a steep studying curve in your undertaking administration software.
Select Jira if . . .
- You require superior undertaking monitoring alongside superior agile options.
- You want in depth customization and integration capabilities.
- You’re in a extremely technical area, particularly software program improvement.
- You already use different Atlassian instruments.
- You could have superior reporting and analytics.
Assessment methodology
For this head-to-head, the important thing criterion for comparability was how Asana and Jira strategy agile undertaking administration. We signed up for the free trials provided by each instruments for hands-on expertise with every to find out their ease of use, strengths and weaknesses. We then in contrast our findings with the platforms’ options and capabilities listed on their internet pages.
Lastly, we checked our findings in opposition to the suggestions of real-world customers to see whether or not we had comparable experiences. Under is a abstract of how they in contrast throughout standards past agile administration.
Standards | ||
---|---|---|
Options | ||
Pricing | ||
Ease of use | ||
Service and assist |